Pulemyot 762 vs XM325
Warzone — LMG vs LMG · Side-by-side stats, TTK & damage profiles
At a Glance
Close TTK
Long TTK
ADS Speed
Bullet Vel.
Reload
Stat Overview
Stat Breakdown
Pulemyot 762
XM325Indigo bar = Pulemyot 762 · Teal bar = XM325 · Green number = better stat
Stat Comparison
| Pulemyot 762 | Stat | XM325 |
|---|---|---|
| 545 | RPM | 1000 |
| 420 | ADS (ms) | 390 |
| 262ms | Sprint-to-Fire | 220ms |
| 810 m/s | Bullet Vel. | 750 m/s |
| 100 | Mag Size | 60 |
| 1 | Vert. Recoil | — |
| 7.3 | Reload (s) | 4.2 |
Green = better stat for that weapon.
TTK Comparison at 150 HP (chest shots)
| Pulemyot 762 | Range | XM325 |
|---|---|---|
| 330ms | 0–34.3m | 360ms |
| 330ms | 34.3–55.9m | 480ms |
| 440ms | 55.9m+ | 540ms |
Green = faster TTK. Assumes all shots connect.
TTK Comparison
When comparing the Pulemyot 762 vs XM325 in Warzone, TTK is often the deciding factor. At close range, the Pulemyot 762 has the faster time-to-kill (330ms vs 360ms). That advantage carries through to longer ranges as well.
Handling and Mobility
Handling is where the Pulemyot 762 and XM325 often diverge most. The XM325 has a faster ADS time at 390ms compared to 420ms for the Pulemyot 762, giving it a reaction speed edge in gun fights. The XM325 also reloads faster, which matters in sustained fights.
Range and Bullet Velocity
Bullet velocity directly impacts how much lead you need to apply at range. The Pulemyot 762 fires at 810 m/s versus 750 m/s for the XM325, making it noticeably more consistent at distance. Combined with TTK data, the Pulemyot 762 is the stronger long-range pick.
Magazine and Reload
Magazine size affects how long you can stay in a fight without reloading. The Pulemyot 762 carries 100 rounds by default versus 60 for the XM325. That extra capacity suits more suppressive or squad-wiping roles. Extended mag attachments are available for both and are typically recommended in any meta build.
Choose Pulemyot 762 if…
- ✓You need faster close-range TTK (330ms vs 360ms)
- ✓You engage at long range — Pulemyot 762 has the edge at 55.9m+
- ✓Higher bullet velocity is key (810 m/s vs 750 m/s)
- ✓Larger magazine (100 vs 60 rounds) suits suppressive play
Choose XM325 if…
- ✓Faster ADS speed matters (390ms vs 420ms)
Which Weapon Should You Use?
The Pulemyot 762 vs XM325 comparison comes down to playstyle. Overall the Pulemyot 762 edges ahead in more categories — particularly TTK and handling — making it the safer all-round pick for most players. The XM325 remains competitive but is better suited to a specific playstyle.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Pulemyot 762 or XM325 better in Warzone?
The Pulemyot 762 vs XM325 comparison comes down to playstyle. Overall the Pulemyot 762 edges ahead in more categories — particularly TTK and handling — making it the safer all-round pick for most players. The XM325 remains competitive but is better suited to a specific playstyle.
What is the TTK of the Pulemyot 762 vs XM325?
At close range, the Pulemyot 762 TTK is 330ms and the XM325 TTK is 360ms (150 HP, chest shots). The Pulemyot 762 is faster.
Which has better ADS speed — Pulemyot 762 or XM325?
The XM325 is faster at 390ms ADS.
More Comparisons
More LMG comparisons with Pulemyot 762: